bclbe

The Berkeley Center for Law, Business and the Economy (BCLBE) is the hub of Berkeley Law's research and teaching on the impact of law on business and the U.S. and global economies.


Fundamentals of Banking Law

October 8-10, 2014                                                 
Bancroft Hotel, Berkeley

In collaboration with the Boston University School of Law, BCLBE is pleased to announce the sponsorship of Fundamentals of Banking Law (formerly Banking Law Basics), an intensive 2½ day program designed to familiarize participants with the basics of banking law, including the critical policies, concepts and regulations that have shaped 150 years of banking law from the passage of the 1863 National Bank Act to the present. Agenda>  Website>

Berkeley Law certifies that this activity has been approved for 19 hours MCLE credit by the State Bar of California.

Events


Managing Tax Audits and Appeals

October 23-24, 2014
San Francisco

In collaboration with Crowell & Moring, this two day seminar will discuss current issues that impact the tax audit process. Designed for those with an interest in tax controversies, this seminar will enable corporate and tax executives to expand their knowledge of key features of the audit process and to focus on opportunities to improve an audit’s outcome through proper management at the early stages and during the administrative appeals process. The focus will be on current developments in the audit and appeals process.

Speakers will include attorneys from Crowell & Moring, government representatives, and academics who will address emerging issues relating to National Appeals Office developments, large case audits, transfer pricing audits, and recent legislative changes relating to tax procedure and administration. Preliminary Agenda>

Berkeley Law certifies that this activity has been approved for 10 hours MCLE credit by the State Bar of California.


JOB OPENING

BCLBE is currently looking for an Associate Director of Corporate & Foundation Relations to work closely with the BCLBE Executive Director and the Berkeley Law development team to secure grants and gifts to support BCLBE's research, education, and policy activities. This is an exciting opportunity to join a dynamic team at Berkeley Law. Go to Berkeley Jobs and search #16419 (no registration required).


For a summary of past events, visit our events page. For videos of our events, go to our video library.


Recent Post on
The Network: Business at Berkeley Law

Our Sponsors

 

 

 




 

NEWS AND PUBLICATIONS

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
The following media is now available:

Smart Course Planning: What to Take in Business Law and Why

Shareholder Activism Symposium
Panel 1
Shareholder Activism: Bird's Eye-View
Panel 2
Hot-Button Issues: How Should We Interpret the Current State of Play?
Panel 3
Future of Shareholder Activism: Where Do We Go From Here?

Social Enterprise Law Symposium
Panel 1
Early-Stage Financing & Mission Preservation
Panel 2
Exits
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

Prof. Steven Davidoff Solomon's latest article discusses how the scandal over the ouster of Dov Charney from American Apparel shows the consequences of confidentiality agreements.

On July 9, Ken Taymor presented "From Corruption to Good Governance: Lessons
from the FCPA and the OECD" at the Goldman School's Ethics and Governance executive education program. The program serves senior-level Indian government administrative officers responsible for making policy in areas such as education, health, transportation and energy.

In “Actavis and Error Costs”, Prof. Aaron Edlin et al. defend the position they took in “Activating Actavis” that payments from a patent holder to fend off litigation from a competitor should be suspect whenever the payment exceeds the cost of litigation and the competitor agrees to stay out of the market. Such “reverse payments” can too easily be a subterfuge for allowing the competitors to split profits even when the patent is of dubious value or validity. This position has been criticized by some economists as too easily marking legitimate, pro-competitive agreements for antitrust litigation, and that SCOTUS never intended Actavis to be applied so broadly. Edlin et al. argue that their approach follows directly from Actavis, and that large reverse payments are generally not economically rational. In the unlikely case where competitors have legitimate pro-competitive reasons for large reverse payments, they would still be able to offer these reasons in defense.

The May 2014 update is now available.





More BCLBE in the news>>