Berkeley Judicial Institute

BJI in the News

  • New York Times icon

    Justice Dept. Tries to Rebuke Federal Judges for Speaking to The Times

    Topics:

    Jeremy Fogel, a retired federal judge who consults with judges on ethics questions and who leads the Berkeley Judicial Institute, said he did not believe the judges had engaged in misconduct. The judges’ comments in the article, he added, “described breaches of professional obligations by government lawyers” and “appear to have been directed to matters within their purview as judges rather than broader policy questions.”

  • New York Times icon

    Justice Alito Recuses Himself Days Before Major Climate-Change Case

    Topics:

    Jeremy Fogel, a retired federal judge and ethics expert who leads the Berkeley Judicial Institute, said that he agreed with Justice Alito’s decision to recuse because, while Justice Alito doesn’t own stock in the companies directly involved, the court’s code of ethics applies to situations where a justice’s financial interests were likely to be affected by the outcome of a case.

  • The Hill logo

    Opinion: Federal judges are being targeted with pizza doxing; no one has been held to account

    “The persistence of coordinated attacks on the judiciary without visible consequence for perpetrators poses a grave threat to our constitutional order,” write Jeremy Fogel, executive director of the Berkeley Judicial Institute at Berkeley Law and Amrit Singh, professor of practice and faculty director of the Rule of Law Lab at New York University School of Law.

  • law360

    New Report Rings Alarm On Threats To Judicial Independence

    “It really is tremendously hard on almost anybody when you get the kinds of threats that people are getting now — the language and the specific threats that are made. The impact on the judges, the impact on the judges’ families and loved ones, the impact just on the routines of their life, I think that’s underreported,” said Jeremy Fogel, executive director of the Berkeley Judicial Institute which published the report “Threats to the Independence of the Federal Judiciary,” along with New York University School of Law’s Rule of Law Lab.

  • law.com

    ‘Is This the Day I’m Going to Get Shot At?’ Lawyers Urged to Do More to Protect Judges

    Judge Jeremy Fogel, executive director of the Berkeley Judicial Institute said lawyers have “a direct stake in an independent judiciary and in the rule of law and in public confidence in the system” and can help explain concepts such as judicial independence, checks and balances and the constitutional role of the courts to the public. 

Upcoming Events

Friday, October 16, 2026, 11:00 am (PT)
Exclusively for Judges

The Hardest Career Decision I Had to Make

Location: Zoom
Speaker: Hon. Keelan Bodow, Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County; Hon. Mary Logan, City of Spokane Municipal Court; Hon. Rohanee Zapanta, Superior Court of California, San Diego County

Behind every courtroom decision is a judge faced with choices that carry extraordinary weight. Join us as Hon. Keelan Bodow (Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County), Hon. Mary Logan (City of Spokane Municipal Court), and Hon. Rohanee Zapanta (Superior Court of California, San Diego County), as they reflect on the difficult decisions they had to make behind the bench and throughout their careers.

Friday, October 23, 2026, 11:00 am (PT)
Exclusively for Judges

Judging Through Midlife: What Every Woman on the Bench Should Know About Menopause, Brain Health, and Aging Well

Location: Zoom
Speaker(s): Dr. Robin Austin, researcher, writer, and host of “midlife.unmasked

Drawing on emerging science and practical strategies, Dr. Robin Austin will explore the impacts of perimenopause and menopause on sleep, cognition and decision-making, mood, heart health, joint pain, sexual health, and quality of life.

Dates and registration to be released
Exclusively for Judges

Cultivating Healing and Health in the Judiciary
A Five-Part Series

Location: Zoom
Description: This five-part virtual series recognizes this impossible context and the unique vulnerabilities that many judges carry, however privately. Premised on a model of mutual accompaniment, it honors judges’ wounds and weariness not as a liability but as a shared reference point from which to come together as judges, to learn, and to heal [SESSION 1]. It exposes judges to practices and paradigms [SESSIONS 2, 3, 4] that represent different ways of being a judge (versus judging). And throughout, it seeks to build a community that finds new experiences of justice in the midst of relationship [SESSION 5].