Whose Death Is it Anyway: Medical-Legal Conflict in the Implementation of End of Life Decision Making
Date: 04/19/2010
Duration: 00:58
Description:
This thought-provoking conversation was presented by Professor Marciarille will be teaching Health Care Law at Berkeley Law School in the fall of 2010. This event was co-sponsored with the Boalt Healthcare and Biotech Law Society.
Sponsor: Berkeley Center on Health, Economic & Family Security
Play Video Now
Download Video – Right-click and choose ‘Save as’ to download file (iPod/iPhone compatible)
The debate over the 2010 health care reform legislation sharpened public discussion on end-of-life decision making for many Americans. Attorneys—practitioners and academics alike—emphasize the values of autonomy and independence in end-of-life decision making and the role of attorneys and courts. But the private implementation of legal documents designed to foster these values can be highly problematic for health care practitioners, family members, and even patients themselves. Why is this? Why is there such a powerful disconnect between rhetoric and implementation on end-of-life decision making? What role does the law play in fostering this disconnect? What role might health care payment systems play?
To view the powerpoint presentation click here.