Intellectual Property

Amicus Brief in Sedlik v. Von Drachenberg

On behalf of Professor Pamela Samuelson, the Samuelson Clinic drafted and filed an amicus brief in a case requiring the Ninth Circuit to interpret and apply the Supreme Court's recent fair use decisions in Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. and Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. Goldsmith. The brief argues that 1) juries can properly decide fair uses cases, 2) Warhol instructs courts and parties to focus on the specific use at issue, and 3) Warhol recognizes many valid justifications for borrowing beyond targeting the original work.

Amicus Brief in Hachette v. Internet Archive

On behalf of three nonprofit organizations, the Samuelson Clinic drafted and filed an amicus brief highlighting the importance of preserving long-standing reader privacy protections in the digital age. Reader privacy, critical to democratic participation, has long been safeguarded by libraries but is under threat by commercial e-book vendors’ intensive tracking of readers’ habits.

Valancourt Books, LLC v. Merrick B. Garland Amicus Brief

On behalf of library associations, the Samuelson Clinic drafted and filed an amicus brief explaining the role of the Copyright Act's deposit requirement in supporting the mission of the Library of Congress and the purposes of copyright.

Amicus Brief in Green v. Department of Justice

On behalf of professors Rebecca Tushnet (Harvard Law) and Pam Samuelson (Berkeley Law), the clinic helped to draft an amicus brief in Green v. DOJ. The brief argues that the DC Circuit should hold that Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act should be subject to strict scrutiny under the First Amendment. Section 1201 blocks access to information and alters the traditional balance between copyright law and free speech. Content-based exceptions, both in 1201 itself and through the triennial review process created by Section 1201, mean the court should subject the statute to strict scrutiny.