Berkeley Law professors are prolific, insightful scholars with broad and significant influence felt well beyond the school’s walls through their research, legal advocacy, policymaking and commentary.

New Research

  • Dave Jones

    Avoiding the ‘Uninsurable Future’

    Dave Jones, director of the Climate Risk Initiative at the Center for Law, Energy & the Environment, recently published an article in the Yale Law Journal analyzing how climate change is driving the growing property-insurance crisis and suggesting federal and state policy solutions.  “The Uninsurable Future: The Climate Threat to Property Insurance, and How to Stop It” compares the response of two states — Florida and California — and finds that neither approach will keep insurance available and affordable in the long run. Insurance is the canary in the climate crisis coal mine, Jones argues, and the bird is dying. 
  • Catherine Fisk

    Labor Law Laurels

    Berkeley Law Professor Catherine Fisk '86 recently received the Miller Award at the 2025 Colloquium on Scholarship in Employment and Labor Law, held at Seton Hall School. Named for the late Paul Miller — a renowned leader in the disability rights movement and an expert on international disability rights and anti-discrimination law — the award is given to an academic who has shown “outstanding academic and public contributions to the field of labor and employment scholarship.”
  • photo of dark-haired man in gray sweater and blue blazer

    Powerful Policy Ideas

    Matthew Hamilton, a Ph.D. student in the Jurisprudence & Social Policy Program, has recently published several essays and white papers for the Edley Center on Law & Democracy and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  • Andrew Baker

    Improving Expert Testimony

    Expert testimony plays a crucial role in modern litigation, but the complexity of legal disputes, particularly in commercial litigation, demands that judges engage deeply with technical methodologies — an expectation that strains judicial capacity and resources. In a new article in the Berkeley Business Law Journal, Professor Andrew C. Baker suggests reforms aligning evidentiary standards and judicial goals to create more transparent, consistent, and equitable outcomes, improve the judiciary’s gatekeeping role, and foster greater trust in the legal process.
  • House where CSLS has offices

    CSLS Fall Speaker Series Announced

    The Center for the Study of Law and Society has unveiled its fall speaker series lineup, offering a weekly dose of pathbreaking interdisciplinary socio-legal scholarship. The lectures, on Mondays from 12:45-2 p.m. from Aug. 25 to Nov. 17, are available in person and on Zoom, with a 12:15 p.m. reception in the Kadish Library to start.

Faculty in the News

  • Reuters logo

    Trump orders ‘blockade’ of sanctioned oil tankers leaving, entering Venezuela

    Topics:

    American presidents have broad discretion to deploy U.S. forces abroad, but Trump’s asserted blockade marks a new test of presidential authority, said international law scholar Elena Chachko of UC Berkeley Law School.
    Blockades have traditionally been treated as permissible “instruments of war,” but only under strict conditions, Chachko said. “There are serious questions on both the domestic law front and international law front,” she added.

  • KQED Forum logo

    How Loyalty Programs Manipulate Consumers and Steal Personal Data

    Topics:

    Samuel A.A. Levine, senior fellow, Center for Consumer Law & Economic Justice, UC Berkeley Law School joins Forum to discuss how loyalty programs exploit consumers, how California is fighting back and to stay alert to the pitfalls.

  • Scotus Blog icon

    Opinion: Bush v. Gore in retrospect

    Topics:

    “What, if any, is the lasting legacy of Bush v. Gore, which was decided 25 years ago, on Dec. 12, 2000?,” writes Dean Erwin Chemerinsky. “It is a case that never has been cited in a majority opinion and thus seems to matter little in the law. Rather, the decision’s largest significance may be from the widespread perception that the justices were simply motivated by their own partisan preferences as to who should be the next president.”

  • Opinion: Cox v. Sony: The Supreme Court’s Quest for a Contributory Infringement Standard

    Topics: ,

    “The U.S. Supreme Court seems likely to shake up American copyright law by articulating a different—and likely a stricter—legal standard for what constitutes contributory copyright infringement in the Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment case,” writes Professor Pamela Samuelson.