Articles

Working for the Office of Legal Counsel in the California Department of Toxic Substances Control, Pantoja gains perspective and confidence while helping protect public health and the environment.

UC Berkeley Law, Berkeley Judicial Institute Executive Director Judge Jeremy Fogel joins Legal Face-Off to discuss the latest on judiciary threats around the country.

“Simply put, the bill would prevent the government from compiling a massive database on those who are not suspected of anything,” writes Dean Erwin Chemerinsky.

Professor Kevin Washburn discusses why the timing of the latest National Indian Gaming Commission revenue report may not capture the effects of prediction markets, the broader risks he believes prediction markets pose to tribal gaming, and the legal questions he believes are headed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

According to data from reform states, juvenile courts no longer charge youth and families more than $61 million in fees each year, and they have discharged a staggering $783 million in debt.

“In terms of a civil penalty from a company to journalists, this is unprecedented on an order of magnitude,” said Vincent Joralemon, a director at UC Berkeley Law and a former corporate lawyer.

“It’s really unclear right now whether the United States has legal authority to do this, to issue these permits,” said UC Berkeley law school professor Holly Doremus, co-director of the school’s Law of the Sea Institute.

The new system greatly speeds up the process of deleting personal data, says Vincent Joralemon, director of the Life Sciences Law and Policy Center at UC Berkeley. Before the DROP system, people would need to contact each data processor and request that their information be deleted.

The $500,000 commitment from Ruth Bell ’67 and her husband Joseph Bell aims to expand the Center for Law, Energy & the Environment’s impact in guiding California policymakers on vital issues. 

“No library can buy every book. It always has to make choices,” Chemerinsky said, but a library that chooses to acquire only books that support the current presidential administration would clearly violate the Constitution. “Where is the line to be drawn?”

Dean Erwin Chemerinsky and Professor Claudia Polsky comment on the targeting of California and other blue states by the Trump administration for political reasons, when cutting funding for clean energy projects. 

Dean Erwin Chemerinsky discusses notable concurring opinions from the most recent Supreme Court term.

Bhargava, who helped develop an AI-powered learning platform in India, and LL.M. classmate Anže Erbežnik aim to streamline criminal proceedings and improve efficiency in bilingual legal environments.

Professors Khiara M. Bridges, Colleen V. Chien ’02, and Dhammika Dharmapala, and Assistant Professor Manisha Padi were recognized for their scholarly and teaching accomplishments.

“For the federal government to announce that it will no longer consider particular kinds of discrimination to violate the law, that guarantees that no person will experience that discrimination, is an incredible diminution of the long-standing protection that Congress has guaranteed to all of us,” said Catherine Lhamon, executive director of the Edley Center on Law and Democracy.

“Never before in American history has there been a president who has shown such disregard for the Constitution and laws of the United States.” writes Dean Erwin Chemerinsky. “It is imperative that there be an attorney general who will try to stop this, not facilitate it. Todd Blanche is clearly not that person, and his nomination should be rejected.”

The Criminal Law & Justice Center at Berkeley Law, along with three partner organizations filed a major new case challenging Solano County’s ban on in-person family visits at its jails. 

“For the first time since 1964, the federal government is closing its eyes to some forms of discrimination, and that leaves more people more vulnerable,” said Catherine Lhamon, executive director of the Edley Center on Law and Democracy at the University of California-Berkeley Law School. “It’s unnecessary and incredibly ugly—it’s about closing a door on federal protection against harm.”

Professor Dan Farber discusses environmental law, climate change, and what happens to environmental law when the federal government turns it’s back on climate action.

Valentine parlays pivotal hands-on experience gained at Berkeley Law into a rewarding internship with the San Francisco Public Defender’s Office Immigration Defense Unit.

Ethan Elkind, director of the climate program at the Center for Law, Energy and the Environment, joins the conversation about how the widening technology gap and lukewarm federal support for clean vehicles threatens the entire U.S. auto industry with obsolescence, and what California is doing about it.

“It is essentially a declaration of liability that institutions can take to the Court of Federal Claims and ask to have their grants reinstated,” says Professor Claudia Polsky, who won a suit last year on behalf of UC faculty whose grants had been terminated. “These states made a really smart strategic decision to seek clarity on the termination clause because it has been invoked so often by the Trump administration.”

“Popular constitutionalism reflects a simple ideal: The Constitution belongs not just to the courts, but to all of us. The American people can and should shape the meaning of the Constitution,” write Professors Joy Milligan and Bertrall Ross.

“If San Francisco wants to support housing, small businesses or green infrastructure, it already has abundant tools to do so with far less risk,” writes Professor Prasad Krishnamurthy.

Investigation co-led by Berkeley Law’s Human Rights Center documents 412 incidents of misuse and 203 injuries across 16 U.S. cities from June 2025 through May 2026.

“When we deny adequate legal representation to individuals trying to correct proven errors or systemic bias, we undermine trust in the law itself,” writes Andrea Crider, staff attorney and lecturer at UC Berkeley School of Law’s Criminal Law & Justice Center.

Dean Erwin Chemerinsky discusses what surprised him most about the latest Supreme Court term.

Taught by two industry experts, the class focuses on the legal, regulatory, and ethical challenges posed by AI-driven innovation in the life sciences.

Ethan Elkind, the director of the climate program at UC Berkeley Law’s Center for Law, Energy & the Environment weighs in on the Committee for Affordable Bay Area Transit’s opposition to sales tax measure Connect Bay Area Act.

Jennifer Urban, a clinical professor of law at UC Berkeley, discusses the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “When takedown notices go outside copyright, the notice is questionable under the DMCA—though complainants, as here, might be very sympathetic,” Urban says.

Dean Erwin Chemerinsky weighs in on the Supreme Court’s Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections decision.

“I can’t even imagine what statute Congress would enact protecting racial equality in voting, especially when it comes to dilution, that would survive a Supreme Court judgment that will rely on Callais,” said Berkeley law professor Bertrall Ross.

“A tragic pattern of the Supreme Court’s recent decisions is leaving individuals who have been seriously injured and whose rights have been violated with no remedy whatsoever,” Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California, Berkeley law school, told CNN. “Rights are meaningless without courts to provide remedies when they are violated.”

With the rule of law under unprecedented pressure, they’re standing up in courtrooms, classrooms, lecture halls, the media, and internationally to fight for justice.

Professors Amanda Tyler and John Yoo comment on the SCOTUS birthright citizenship decision.

“Trump won where his agenda coincided with the one that the conservative court has pursued long before his arrival on the scene,” said Professor John Yoo.

“The court said that the states had an important interest in barring transgender girls and women from participating because they would have a competitive advantage and because they would create a safety issue for other players, Writes Dean Erwin Chemerinksy. “The problem with this argument is that it was unproven.”

Amanda Tyler, a law professor at Berkeley Law, says that the court’s dynamics are more nuanced than a simple 6-3 conservative-liberal split. “It is in some respects a 6-3 court, but more specifically, the Constitution right now means what 2 out of 3 justices, particular justices, say it means. And those three justices are Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and Justice Amy Coney Barrett,” Tyler said.

“On the last day of the term, the court pleased conservatives by allowing states to prohibit transgender athletes from participating in sports corresponding to their gender identity, but, importantly, it also invalidated Trump’s executive order limiting birthright citizenship,” writes Dean Erwin Chemerinsky.

Professor John Yoo and Dean Erwin Chemerinsky weigh in on the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to hand Donald Trump broad authority to fire regulatory agency heads.

Ly, a first-generation college student whose parents were factory workers, describes why his work at the plaintiff-side firm Bryan Schwartz Law is expanding both his skills and resolve. 

“This is a new way of doing business,” said Seth Galanter, an attorney who worked for OCR under the Obama and Biden administrations and is now a senior fellow at the Edley Center on Law and Democracy at Berkeley Law. “There’s no nuance,” Galanter said. “There’s no inquiry into whether there’s a hostile environment. They say, ‘You have a policy, and the policy violated the law and yeah, you’re in trouble now.’ That is not something that prior administrations would have done.”

“It is ironic for the court to make this ruling during the week in which we celebrate the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, which was written as an objection to unchecked executive power,” writes Dean Erwin Chemerinsky.

“If the celebration of the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence is to have meaning, it
must be to recommit to these enduring principles and to act upon them in our time,” writes Dean Erwin Chemerinsky.

“California’s boom in data centers places growing demands on stressed water resources,” writeMichael Kiparsky, director of the Wheeler Water Institute at UC Berkeley Law’s Center for Law, Energy & the Environment. and environmental policy research fellow Marie Grimm. “Everyone who uses the internet benefits from data centers. Yet the impacts of data centers are felt most by the communities where these facilities are built and there is no state law controlling their spread.”

“The disastrous war in Iran reveals the brilliance of the framers of the Constitution in creating a government based on separation of powers — and the folly in abandoning that framework.” writes Dean Erwin Chemerinsky.

“A series of Supreme Court rulings this week share a disturbing theme: closing courthouse doors and leaving religious prisoners, cancer victims and asylum seekers with rights on paper but almost no way to enforce them,” writes Dean Erwin Chemerinsky.

The catalyst for the State Bar of California’s new Privacy Law Specialization, Serrato has built a practical training initiative for senior leaders in data strategy, innovation, governance, and risk management. 

“Overall, the decision is a huge blow for victims of human rights abuses who hope to have their claims heard in U.S. Federal Courts,” said UC Berkeley law professor Saira Mohamed.

While the details of the interagency agreement are vague, director of the Edley Center on Law & Democracy Catherine E. Lhamon said the shifts are sure to slow down civil rights claims. “An agreement to further slow down the work is unconscionable.”