Wednesday, July 15, 12:00 P.M. PT
“Sober as a judge” is a trope for good reason, but there has been little serious study about the elements of judicial temperament. Most people who have spent time in court can think of both positive and negative examples of judicial behavior, but developing a psychological framework for understanding that behavior is surprisingly difficult. As virtual proceedings provide more transparency, judges are on public view to a greater extent than ever before. What should viewers be looking for?
Access Professor Maroney’s Article: (What We Talk About When We Talk About) Judicial Temperament
Testimony of Hon. Jeremy Fogel (ret.), Executive Director of Berkeley Judicial Institute, to the United States House Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Courts.
Thursday, June 25
“Expanding Electronic Access to the Federal Courts: The Unexpected Opportunity Presented by the COVID-19 Pandemic”
Event Recording – Judge Fogel’s testimony starts at 26:20.
Best Practices in Court Administration: What We’ve Learned from COVID
Wednesday, June 24, 12:00 P.M. PT
Courts, lawyer and judges move deliberately. The pandemic has challenged courts to do things in ways that are uncomfortable. Judge Jeremy Fogel, BJI Executive Director, will moderate a discussion about those challenges with key court players. Participants are IAALS Executive Director Justice Scott Bales and U.S. District Court Judge Julie Robinson.
Best Practices in Judicial Administration: What We’ve Learned During COVID
Wednesday, June 3, 12:00 P.M. PT
Good realized during a crisis would be awful to waste. Judge Jeremy Fogel, BJI Executive Director, will moderate a discussion of some of the positive impact for the courts during the pandemic, with some key players creating that positive impact. Participants are Michigan Chief Justice Bridget Mary McCormack and Professor Caitlin Moon.
Mindful Judging: Thinking Fast and Slow
May 12, 2020
Professor Scott Rogers interviews Judge Jeremy Fogel. They explore the elegant portions of Judge Fogel’s 2016 article “Mindfulness and Judging,” this time focusing on his reference to Daniel Kahneman’s book, “Thinking, Fast and Slow.”
Judicial Panel: PTAB’s LEAP Initiative for NextGen Lawyers
Friday, May 29
12:00 P.M.PST, 2:00 P.M. CST, 3:00 P.M. EST)
Sponsors: Federal Circuit Bar Association; Berkeley Center for Law & Technology; ChIPs
Please join the Federal Circuit Bar Association, Berkeley Center for Law & Technology, the Berkeley Judicial Institute, & ChIPs for a discussion on the USPTO’s Legal Experience and Advancement Program (LEAP), which launched earlier this month. The LEAP initiative is designed to encourage the professional development of patent attorneys and agents appearing before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) through increased opportunities for oral advocacy.
Deputy Chief Judge Jackie Bonilla
Judge Bonilla currently serves as the Deputy Chief Judge at the PTAB at the USPTO. Since her appointment as an Administrative Patent Judge in January 2012, she has conducted numerous post-grant patent trials under the America Invents Act, heard appeals from adverse examiner decisions in patent applications and reexamination proceedings, and rendered decisions in interferences. Previously, she worked for twelve years in private practice, including as a partner at Foley & Lardner, LLP. She also served as a judicial law clerk to the now-retired Chief Judge Randall Rader at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Judge Bonilla graduated from the University of Virginia School of Law, and holds a Ph.D. in Pharmacology from the University of Virginia, and a B.A. in Biochemistry from the University of California, Berkeley.
Vice Chief Judge Janet Gongola
Janet Gongola manages internal and external engagement on behalf of the PTAB, including development of educational programs and PTAB procedures and rules. She was appointed to the PTAB in October 2016. Before joining the Board, Judge Gongola was the Senior Advisor to the Under Secretary and Director of the USPTO where she advised on all matters of law and policy. Before joining the USPTO, Judge Gongola served as a law clerk for the Honorable Paul R. Michel at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and for the Honorable Judge Sue L. Robinson at the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. In addition, Judge Gongola worked as a patent attorney, patent agent, and research chemist at Eli Lilly and Company in Indianapolis, Indiana. Judge Gongola graduated from Indiana University School of Law, and she received B.S. degrees in Chemistry and Mathematics from Muskingum University.
Judge Christa Zado
Judge Zado serves as an Administrative Patent Judge at the USPTO.
The Panel will be introduced by:
Kathi Vidal. Kathi is managing partner of Winston & Strawn’s Silicon Valley office and one of the leading patent litigators and Federal Circuit advocates in the country. Kathi founded the ChIPs Next Gen effort and advises tribunals on Next Gen issues and orders.
The Panel will be moderated by Winston & Strawn Associates and PTAB advocates who qualify for the LEAP program:
Claire Fundakowski. Claire is a former Federal Circuit clerk for Judge Kimberly Moore and registered pharmacist with a Pharm.D. She represents clients in patent litigation with a focus on Hatch-Waxman litigation and appeals.
Noori Torabi. Noori is a registered patent attorney with a B.S. and M.S. in Biotechnology and a Ph.D. in Molecular Biology. She litigates patent disputes in district court and in the PTAB.
11:00 A.M. – 12:00 P.M. PT
Three of this country’s busiest judges – Federal District Court Judges Alan D. Albright (TXWD), Rodney Gilstrap (TXED), and Maryellen Noreika (DED) – will provide insight on how they are proceeding with cases while courts across the country are shut down due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Topics of discussion may include:
What are the ramifications of COVID-19 on dockets?
How are hearings conducted? What works well? What can be improved? What can litigants do better?
What kinds of requests are coming in from litigants? How are they being handled?
What lessons are being learned from this time? Will the way cases are managed or tried change after COVID-19?
Has the new format of hearings impacted public access to hearings? Has there been any innovation in that area?
Has moving to virtual hearings provided more opportunities for junior lawyers to argue?
24th Annual BCLT/BTLJ Symposium
Courts and the Press
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 95 7th Street, San Francisco, CA 94103
140 Law Building, UC Berkeley School of Law
The Human Side of Judging
June 19, 2019, 6:00-7:30pm
Booth Auditorium (175 Law Building), UC Berkeley School of Law
More information here
In One Sitting
June 17, 2019
Keynote Address: In One Sitting: Reflections on 37 Years on the Bench. Hon Jeremy Fogel, First Executive Director of the Berkeley Judicial Institute and former Director of the Federal Judicial Center, delivering keynote address @ Aleph Institute’s Rewriting the Sentence Summit, June 17th. New York, New York (June 17-18, 2019): The Aleph Institute held the Rewriting the Sentence 2019 summit at Columbia Law School, convening hundreds of judges, prosecutors, defense counsel, probation and pretrial officers, individuals directly affected by incarceration, and other key stakeholders in the criminal justice system to discuss the massive culture change taking place in the alternatives to incarceration arena.
The Rewriting the Sentence summit highlighted a vast array of innovative alternative approaches to criminal justice currently isolated in pockets throughout the country.
Continue this critical dialogue online. Follow @AlephInstitute on Twitter and post your thoughts & comments using #RewritingTheSentence.
More information here
Democracy and Justice in the Age of Disinformation
May 1, 2019
Center for Strategic & International Studies
Spring 2019 Symposium: Charting a Path for Federal Judiciary Reform
April 12, 2019, 8:30am-5:30pm
Chevron Auditorium, International House, UC Berkeley
More information here
Women at the Court
April 11, 2019, 6:00-8:30pm
Warren Room, Boalt Hall, UC Berkeley School of Law
More information here
On Topic: Federal Judicial Center Marks 50th Anniversary
December 20, 2017
In this interview program, we talk with Senior Judge Jeremy Fogel, Director of the Federal Judicial Center in Washington, DC. Judge Fogel explains why the FJC was created, and how the agency’s mission has developed over half a century. The FJC was established by Congress in 1967 with just two employees, but now the Center provides education and training for judges and employees of the federal courts. It also conducts empirical studies and exploratory research into different aspects of judicial administration, such as case management, alternative dispute resolution, and proposed amendments to the federal rules of procedure. The Center also documents the history of the federal courts.
Diversity of Experience: The Path to Becoming Chief (Inter-Court Conference 2016: The Future of Courts)
Published on April 6, 2017
This is an edited version of a panel discussion that took place at the regional Inter-Court Conference in Asheville, North Carolina, in September 2016. The discussion, moderated by Judge Jeremy D. Fogel, Director of the Federal Judicial Center, looks at the careers of four African-American jurists: three chief judges of the U.S. courts of appeals and the chief justice of a state supreme court. The judges appearing in the video are Chief Judge R. Guy Cole, Jr. (Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals), Chief Judge Roger Gregory (Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals), Chief Justice Bernette Johnson (Louisiana Supreme Court), and Chief Judge Carl Stewart (Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals). The discussion focuses on how the judges overcame hardship and discrimination in their early lives and careers to reach their current positions.
Aula Magna – Mediação e Conciliação (Lecture Hall—Mediation and Conciliation)
June 10, 2015
Judge Fogel talking about mediation and learning the skill of listening.
Federal judges to recharge at Vanderbilt Law School, by Jim Patterson
March 14, 2014
This video features Professor Terry Maroney talking about Vanderbilt’s efforts to interact with the judiciary, and about the Federal Judicial Center’s midcareer program for district judges.