Tuesday, April 27
8:45 A.M. – 3:00 P.M. (PT)
Should the U.S. cooperate or confront China on tech issues? Can the U.S. work with its allies to advance areas of common interests with respect to China? What role should unilateral trade measures, including export controls or tariff sanctions, play in our approach to China? How can China and the U.S. work together to address global challenges such as pandemics and climate change? The Berkeley Center for Law & Technology’s third annual Tech, Trade and China conference consisted of three sessions:
- The Role of the WTO and Trade Agreements in Technology and IP
- Export Controls and Technology Collaboration
- Common Challenges – Climate Change and Public Health
April 20, 2021
1:00 –2:00 P.M. (PT)
On April 5, the Supreme Court handed down its much-anticipated decision in one of the most consequential copyright cases of our time, Google v. Oracle. In ruling that fair use permitted Google to incorporate elements of the Java API into its software for the Android phone, the Court clarified standards not only for fair use as applied to software but also arguably for other copyrighted works as well.
Our assessment of this momentous decision will be led by Profs. Peter Menell and Pamela Samuelson. In addition to filing amicus briefs in the case, they have written extensively about it and the broader issues of software copyright. They will be joined by Supreme Court advocate Tom Goldstein, who argued the case for Google, and by Prof. Sean O’Connor of the Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University.
This event is free. CA MCLE credit will be provided.
April 15-16, 2021
In digital networked environments, laws and regulations are not the only source of rulemaking. Technical standards, the configuration of software, the architecture of hardware, and industry articulations of best practices also affect how information flows are permitted or forbidden. Joel Reidenberg’s prescient article, Lex Informatica: The Formulation of Information Policy Rules Through Technology, published in the Texas Law Review in 1998, urged policymakers to understand, consciously recognize, and encourage the evolution of these extra-legal influences to achieve optimal public policy outcomes. This symposium will honor the legacy of Reidenberg’s deep insights about Lex Informatica as policy levers and will explore respects in which Lex Informatica is working in the public interest and ways in which technology regulations could be improved.
Oral Advocacy at its Finest: Circuit Judge Kimberly Moore and District Court Judge Alan Albright Discuss What Works (and Doesn’t)
Co-organized with Winston & Strawn
April 5, 2021
Whether you are an associate or a junior lawyer looking for insights into what is most helpful to judges or tips on the best ways to advance your positions and win for your clients, Federal Circuit Judge Kimberly Moore and District Court Judge Alan Albright will share their views. Both judges had illustrious careers before joining the bench: Judge Moore as an engineer, advocate, and well-known, prolific professor and Judge Albright as a magistrate judge, trial lawyer, and advocate. The judges went out of their way to mentor and guided junior advocates and came together to share their views. The panel was moderated by Winston & Strawn Silicon Valley Managing Partner and district court and Federal Circuit advocate Kathi Vidal.
Symposium: 25th Anniversary of the Telecommunications Act of 1996—Looking Ahead to the Next Telecommunications Act
March 12, 2021
To mark the 25th anniversary of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, this symposium explored possible facets of the next major telecommunications reform effort (whenever it may be), including technological convergence and regulatory power; race and diversity in communications law; institutional design and the Federal Communications Commission; and federalism and state power.
Co-sponsored with the Federal Communications Law Journal and hosted at The George Washington University Law School
This symposium explored the phenomenon of cyber-hate. What are the key issues and manifestations? What are the appropriate responses to online hate? What are the frameworks available— legal, social, technological — and possible constraints to responding? How do we evaluate the success of various solutions?
Session 1 — February 4, 2021: Translating Hate in the Digital World
Session 2 — March 4, 2021: Combating Online Hate: Law, Technology, and Society
February 19, 2021
This Symposium explored the history of design patent protection and the evolution of the key ornamentality/non-functionality doctrine. The lead paper, Design Patent Law’s Identity Crisis authored by Professor Peter Menell and Ella Corren, framed the Symposium. Panels comprised of academic and practitioner commentators discussed the past, present, and future of design protection.
3.75 total hours of CLE credit offered.
January 21 – 29, 2021
Full series (4 sessions): $250.00
Single day: $75.00
Asia IP sponsors, academics, non-profit, government and students: complimentary
A distinguished group of judges, officials, practitioners and academics from the United States and China discussed issues such as SEP’s, trade secrets, patent linkage for pharmaceuticals, on-line enforcement, and trans-border legal ethics.