PLSC Paper Awards

PLSC Reidenberg-Kerr Award

Named for our late colleagues, Joel Reidenberg and Ian Kerr, the Reidenberg-Kerr Award is based on the overall excellence of a paper submitted by a pre-tenure scholar. The papers are selected by the PLSC program committee.

Year	Authors	Title	Cite
2020	Jon Penney	Understanding Chilling Effects and their Harms	TBD
2020	Rebecca Wexler	Privacy as Privilege	TBD
2019	Sandra Wachter and Brent Mittelstadt	A Right to Reasonable Inferences Re-Thinking Data Protection Law in the Age of Big Data and AI	Columbia Business Law Review, 2019(2)
2018	Anne Boustead	Effect of Privacy Protections on Law Enforcement Use of Prescription Drug Monitoring Databases	OSF Pre-Print (April 2019)
2018	Sarah Lageson	“Digital Punishment and Digital Avoidance”: Privacy Conceptions of Criminal Records in the Internet Age	Forthcoming as book project.
2017	Roger Ford	Data Scams	57 Houston Law Review 111 (2019)
2017	Sebastian Benthall, Seda Gürses, Helen Nissenbaum	Contextual Integrity through the Lenses of Computer Science	Foundations and Trends® in Privacy and Security: Vol. 2: No. 1, pp 1-69.
2016	Matthew Tokson	Knowledge and Fourth Amendment Privacy	111 Northwestern University Law Review 139 (2016)
2016	Margot Kaminski	Privacy and the Right to Record	97 B.U. L. Rev. 167 (2017)
2015	Jennifer Daskal	The Un-Territoriality of Data	125 Yale L. J. 326 (2015)
2015	Margaret Hu	Big Data Blacklisting	67 Florida L. Rev. 1735 (2015)
2015	Bilyana Petkova	The Safeguards of Privacy Federalism in the United States and the European Union	20 Lewis & Clark Law Review 595 (2016)

International Association of Privacy Professionals Paper Award

The International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) sponsors an award for two papers presented at PLSC. The two winning authors will each receive $2500 from IAPP, an opportunity to present the paper at the IAPP Privacy Academy (travel will be provided for up to two authors of each paper), and an opportunity to publish an abstract or summary of the paper in the Privacy Advisor. The criteria are overall excellence and relevance to the practice of privacy law.

Year	Authors	Title	Cite
2019	Ari Waldman	Privacy Law’s False Promise	97 Wash. U. L. Rev. 773 (2019)
2018	Xin Dai	Toward A Reputation State: The Social Credit System Project of China	SSRN 2018
2018	Daniel Susser, Beate Roessler, and Helen Nissenbaum	Online Manipulation	SSRN 2018
2017	Ari Waldman	Designing Without Privacy	55 Houston Law Review 659 (2017)
2016	Danielle Citron	The Privacy Policymaking of State Attorneys General	92 Notre Dame Law Review 747 (2016)
2016	Pauline Kim	Data Driven Discrimination at Work	William and Mary Law Review (2017)
2015	Lauren Willis	Performance-Based Consumer Law	82 U. Chicago L. Rev. 1309 (2015)
2015	Sarah Igo	Social Insecurities: Numbering Identity in the U.S. Since the 1930s	This paper became part of Igo’s book, The Known Citizen
2014	Danielle Keats Citron & Frank A. Pasquale	The Scored Society: Due Process for Automated Predictions	89 Wash. L. Rev. 1 (2014)
2014	Solon Barocas & Andrew Selbst	Big Data’s Disparate Impact	104 Cal. L. Rev. 671 (2016)
2013	Ryan Calo	Digital Market Manipulation	82 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 995 (2014)
2013	Daniel J. Solove & Woodrow Hartzog	The FTC and the New Common Law of Privacy	114 Colum. L. Rev. 583 (2014)
2012	Ira Rubinstein & Nathan Good	Privacy by Design: A Counterfactual Analysis of Google and Facebook Privacy Incidents	28 Berk. Tech. L. J. 1333 (2013)
2012	Alessandro Acquisti & Christina M. Fong	An Experiment in Hiring Discrimination Via Online Social Networks	WEIS 2013
2011	Woodrow Hartzog & Frederic Stutzman	The Case for Online Obscurity	101 Cal. L. Rev. 1 (2013)
2011	Michelle Madejski, Maritza Johnson & Steven Bellovin	The Failure of Online Social Network Privacy Settings	CUCS-010-11