Thursday, December 14
8:00 AM | |
8:50 AM |
Welcoming Remarks Presiding Officer: |
9:00 AM |
§101 Case Update This panel will discuss how to navigate subject matter patentability in the PTO and Moderator: |
10:00 AM |
Venue The Supreme Court’s decision in TC Heartland has fundamentally changed the KATHI VIDAL, Winston & Strawn LLP |
11:00 AM |
15 Minute Break |
11:15 AM |
Damages Infringement, validity, and procedural maneuvering are all fine and good, but the reason businesses care about patent litigation is the money. This panel will draw on the experience of both outside and in-house counsel to explore damages issues, including apportionment, enhanced damages, and the impact of evolving local rules on damages. Moderator: |
12:15 AM |
Lunch
Presiding Officer: |
12:45 AM |
Lunch Keynote: Interview with Michelle Lee Bijal Vakil will discuss with Michelle Lee her experience as head of MICHELLE LEE, Former Director, USPTO |
2:00 PM |
FRAND/SEPS This session will examine issues implicated by FRAND and SEPs, including royalty MIKE LEE, Google |
2:30 PM |
Indemnification Using an interactive approach, our panelists will walk through the key issues ISABELLA FU, Microsoft |
3:00 PM |
15 Minute Break |
3:15 PM |
The Patent Markets This panel will discuss the current state of the secondary patent market, who’s buying, who’s selling, and at what price? It will look at what happens to patents after a sale, including the chance of winning on a bought patent. It will examine both stand-alone sales and the relatively invisible marketplace in which patents contribute significant value to a deal, including M&As, technology spinouts, JV’s, tech-transfers, and exclusive field-of-use licenses. RON LAURIE, Inflexion Point Strategy, LLC |
4:00 PM |
§102/103 This session will provide a comprehensive review of recent decisions on Sections BETTY CHEN, Fish & Richardson |
4:30 PM |
Judges Panel Judges experienced in presiding over patent disputes will offer insights on patent trial and litigation issues in light of the rapidly evolving patent law landscape. Moderator: |
5:30 PM |
Closing Remarks |
Friday, December 15
8:00 AM |
Continental Breakfast
Presiding Officer: |
8:30 AM |
PTAB Practice and Strategy What do petitioners and patent owners need to know in an era of tapering institution and claim cancellation rates and in view of increasingly aggressive Federal Circuit review? HARPER BATTS, Baker Botts LLP |
10:00 AM |
Debate: Is the PTAB Constitutional? Oil States is arguably the most important patent law case of the decade. The question in the case is whether the IPR proceeding created in the America Invents Act is unconstitutional because only juries, or at least Article III courts, can lawfully cancel patents. The implications could go beyond IPRs. This debate-style panel will preview some of arguments likely to be considered by the Supreme Court. DMITRY KARSHTEDT, George Washington University Law School |
10:30 AM |
15 Minute Break |
10:45 AM |
Those Products Flew in From Abroad, Are Your Patents Exhausted? The Supreme Court’s holding in Impression Products v. Lexmark disrupted a multitude of sales and licensing models built on decades of Federal Circuit case law concerning the exhaustion doctrine. This presentation will navigate effective offensive and defensive litigation strategies in light of the new post-Lexmark rules. Structures for licensing and product sales to avoid post-Lexmark exhaustion will also be addressed. YAR CHAIKOVSKY, Paul Hastings LLP |
11:15 AM |
Business Planning Around Changes in the Law This panel will consider the relationship among Supreme Court patent law decisions, business strategy, and in-house legal planning: how have businesses responded? For example, after Lexmark, does a company change its strategy on sales abroad, or on manufacture abroad? Could TC Heartland cause businesses to rethink where they locate their facilities? Have Alice and the near death of business method (and medical diagnostic?) patents affected corporate and legal planning? MARTA BECKWITH, PacTech Law |
12:00 PM |
Lunch
Presiding Officer: |
1:00 PM |
Privilege in Multinational Litigations Most significant IP litigations now involve an international dimension, such as concurrent litigation of counterpart patents in multiple jurisdictions. Yet privilege and work product rules may differ significantly between these jurisdictions, and maintaining privilege will likely require compliance with varying privilege requirements. This session will discuss differences in the rules between the KEITH SLENKOVICH, WilmerHale |
1:30 PM |
Disclosures in Prosecution and Litigation This session will first describe the different disclosure obligations in prosecution and post-grant review and compare and contrast them. Then it will analyze how concurrent prosecution, post-grant proceedings, and litigation can create traps for the unwary. DAVID HRICIK, Mercer University School of Law |
2:00 PM |
Patent Year in Review A summary of the most important developments in Supreme Court and Federal Circuit law this year. MARK LEMLEY, Stanford Law School |
2:30 PM |
15 Minute Break |
2:45 PM |
Identifying Trade Secrets in Litigation Uniquely among IP rights, trade secrets are not defined until they are litigated. JIM POOLEY, James Pooley PLC |
3:15 PM |
Elimination of Bias Despite the $8 billion spent annually by corporations to eliminate bias and increase Moderator: Panelists: |
4:15 PM |
Closing Remarks |
UC Berkeley School of Law certifies that this activity has been approved by the State Bar of California for 13.75 hours Continuing Legal Education credit, including 1.0 hour in Legal Ethics and 1.0 hour in Elimination of Bias.