 |
The Common Thread: Diversion in the Jurisprudence of a Century of Juvenile Justice
|
Franklin E. Zimring
|
| |
| A central objective of those who created the juvenile court
was to protect young delinquents from the destructive punishments
of the criminal justice system. This promotion of juvenile court
as a diversion from criminal justice is distinct from more
ambitious programs of "child saving" intervention because avoiding
harm can be achieved even if no effective crime prevention
treatments are available. This essay shows diversion has been an
important motive in juvenile justice from the beginning, and
became the dominant purpose of a separate juvenile court after
In Re Gault in 1967. The past thirty years have been the
juvenile court's finest hour as a diversion project; the rate of
juvenile incarceration has been stable, while incarceration of
young adults has soared. |
|
Copyright
© 2000 by California Law Review, Inc.
California Law Review, Inc. (CLR) is a California
nonprofit corporation.
CLR and the authors are solely responsible for
the content of their publications.
|
|