 |
Contract and Copyright Are
Not at War: A Reply to "The Metamorphosis of Contract into Expand"
|
Joel
Rothstein Wolfson
|
| |
| This Comment replies to David Nimmer, Elliot
Brown, and Gary N. Frischling's Article that
proposes state legislation declaring contracts
unenforceable if they are "non-negotiable,"
to the extent they: 1) license uncopyrightable
information; or 2) "abrogate or restrict"
fair use. Both prongs create unintended
consequences that far outweigh benefits because:
1) uncopyrightable information is a fast growing
and socially important industry; and 2)
contractual restrictions on fair use serve
important purposes (such as protecting privacy or
guarding against piracy). This Comment observes
that a test of "non-negotiability"
would prove unsustainable in practice, and that
what the authors propose would not produce good
law. This Comment suggests instead that we let
courts use their existing powers to police
oppressive terms or take the matter to Congress. |
|
Copyright
© 1999 by California Law Review, Inc.
California Law Review, Inc. (CLR) is a California
nonprofit corporation.
CLR and the authors are solely responsible for
the content of their publications.
|
|