 |
|
LesBiGay Identity as Commodity |
|
David M. Skover & |
|
| This Essay explores the deep dissonance that exists today between
the validation of American LesBiGays in the commercial marketplace
and their devaluation in political and legal arenas, and questions
the failure of legal scholars and civil rights activists to account
meaningfully for this dissonance in their theories and practices. In America's popular culture, LesBiGay identities abound. In its political culture, however, they emerge more tentatively. The commercial and entertainment industries increasingly commodify and celebrate LesBiGay identities. The courts and legislatures generally discount and condemn them. Thus, there is a deep dissonance between the validation of LesBiGay identities in the economic marketplace of items and ideas, and their devaluation in the legal arena of rights and remedies. Such a dissonance fosters a fragmented sense of what LesBiGay identities are, and whether or how they are valued. Surprisingly, this schizoid treatment of LesBiGay identity is largely ignored or misunderstood by legal theorists and practitioners. Typically, they look primarily to politics and law for the paths to LesBiGay self-realization and social inclusion. The academy and activists have yet to appreciate that consumer-driven corporatism, commercial entrepreneurship, and the fetishes and fantasies of the mass media are unleashing powerful cultural forces that will influence, for better or worse, the LesBiGay quest for liberty and equality. For if "the business of America is business," then surely the Americanization of the LesBiGay identity is business, too. Consequently, any legal theory or political program that takes no serious account of the commodified LesBiGay identity is likely to fail. Such a serious account is the object of this essay. |
|
|
|
|
Copyright
© 2001 by California Law Review, Inc. |
|