†1991 Timothy A. Brooks
† Associate, Ice Miller Donadio & Ryan, Indianapolis, Indiana. J.D. 1991, University of California Los Angeles; A.B., 1988 Dartmouth College. This comment received First Prize in the 1990 High Technology Law Journal Comment Competition. The competition was sponsored by the law firms of Cooley Godward Castro Huddleson & Tatum; Fenwick & West; Ware & Friedenrich; and Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, all of Palo Alto, California. The author would like to thank Professors Rod Margo, Phillip Trimble, and Arthur Rosett of the UCLA School of Law and Professor William Alford of the Harvard Law School for their helpful comments and suggestions, Jerry Sully and the staff of the High Technology Law Journal for their additional assistance, and Kathy for her patience.
1. In the United States, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) determined the course of development and contracted with the private sector for particular engineering and construction needs. Corcoran & Beardsley, The New Space Race, SCI. AM., July 1990 at 72, 74.
2. Katz, New Directions Needed in U.S. Space Policy, in INTERNATIONAL SPACE POLICY: LEGAL, ECONOMIC, AND STRATEGIC OPTIONS FOR THE TWENTIETH CENTURY AND BEYOND 47, 47-48 (D. Papp & J. McIntyre eds. 1987) [hereinafter INTERNATIONAL SPACE POLICY].
3. Jones, National Security, Technology Transfer Controls, and U.S. Space Policy, in INTERNATIONAL SPACE POLICY, supra note 2, at 65, 66.
4. See infra notes 120-29, 140 and accompanying text.
5. See generally, Logsdon, The Space Shuttle Program: A Policy Failure?, 232 SCIENCE 1099, 1100-1101 (1986).
6. Original 1972 operating cost estimates for the shuttle were $10.4 million per flight, or $160 per pound put in orbit. Id. at 1102. Those estimates have been drastically revised. More recent estimates of the cost of a shuttle mission dedicated specifically to commercial satellite launching run as high as $350 million per flight. Corcoran & Beardsley, supra note 1, at 74. The price per launch charged by NASA's commercial competitors ranges from the $50 million average of Arianespace, Comment, Legal Aspects of the Commercialization of Space Transportation Systems, 3 HIGH TECH. L.J. 99, 105 (1988), to the $125 million of Martin -Marietta, Kolcum, Commercial Titan Launch Vehicle Places Two Communications Satellites in Orbit, AVIATION WK. & SPACE TECH., Jan. 8, 1990, at 42-43. Foreign governmental launchers have been known to undercut commercial prices. See infra note 91. Even if NASA launches two satellites per shuttle flight, it will still have to justify the $50 million to $125 million premium per satellite by providing vastly superior service. If it cannot do so, it will have to recoup the shortfall by selling off ancillary services to the satellite launchers and other shuttle customers. Thus the shuttle cannot be competitive unless it charges rates below cost.
7. Corcoran & Beardsley, supra note 1, at 74-75.
8. See infra notes 46-65 and accompanying text.
9. Robinson & Meredith, Domestic Commercialization of Space: The Current Political Atmosphere, in 1 AMERICAN ENTERPRISE, THE LAW, AND THE COMMERCIAL USE OF SPACE 1, 4 (1986) [hereinafter AMERICAN ENTERPRISE]
10. Id.
11. Dula, Private Sector Activities in Outer Space, 19 INT'L LAW. 159, 183 (1985).
12. So long as government launchers are market leaders, pricing will not be indicative of costs, Hertzfeld, Economic, Market, and Policy Issues of International Launch Vehicle Competition, in INTERNATIONAL SPACE POLICY, supra note 2, at 203, 214, and commercial launchers will probably be forced to price at very low profitability in the short term in order to develop a capacity to compete in the long-term market.
13. One of the actions taken by the administration toward this end was the designation, by Executive Order 12465 on February 24, 1984, of the Department of Transportation as lead agency for the regulation of private ELV launching. The Department of Transportation then created the Office of Commercial Space Transportation to oversee its responsibilities. Robinson & Meredith, supra note 9, at 3.
14. Commercial Space Launch Act, Pub. L. No. 98-575, 98 Stat. 3055, amended by Commercial Space Launch Act Amendments of 1988, Pub. L. No. 100-657, 102 Stat. 3900 (codified as amended at 49 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2623 (1988)).
15. 49 U.S.C. §§ 2605-2613 (1988).
16. Id. § 2615.
17. Id. § 2614.
18. Id. See infra note 315 and accompanying text.
19. Commercial Space Launch Act, Pub. L. No. 98-575, § 16, 98 Stat. 3055 (1984).
20. Id., as amended by Commercial Space Launch Act Amendments of 1988, Pub. L. No. 100-657, § 5, 102 Stat. 3900, 3902 (codified as amended at 49 U.S.C. § 2615 (1988)).
21. 49 U.S.C. § 2615(a)(1)(A) (1988).
22. Id. § 2615(a)(1)(D).
23. See infra note 62 and accompanying text.
24. See infra notes 181-82 and accompanying text.
25. Commercial Space Launch Act Amendments of 1988, Pub. L. No. 100-657, § 10, 102 Stat. 3900, 3907 (1988).
26. 49 U.S.C. § 2614(a), (b) (1988).
27. Id. § 2614(b)(1). The Air Force's draft agreement for commercial use of government launch facilities was assaulted at House hearings by the commercial launch industry as overly burdensome. State of the Commercial Launch Industry: Hearings Before the Subcomm. on Space Science and Applications of the House Comm. on Science, Space, and Technology, 100th Cong., 1st Sess. (1987) [hereinafter Hearings]. The Air Force has since produced another draft of its agreement. Department of the Air Force, Model Expendable Launch Vehicle Commercialization Agreement: Revision Two (May 12, 1989). For a discussion of the original model agreement, see Comment, supra note 6, at 116.
28. See OFFICE OF TECH. ASSESSMENT, LAUNCH OPTIONS FOR THE FUTURE x (1988).
29. Comment, supra note 6, at 103.
30. The United States has not announced a policy with respect to providing commercial services of which only the space shuttle is capable, such as satellite recovery.
31. Kolcum, Joint Atlas Centaur Mission Orbits FltSatCom Spacecraft, AVIATION WK. & SPACE TECH., Oct. 2, 1989 at 23 (reporting launch of last government-commercial joint venture).
32. Reynolds & Merges, Toward an Industrial Policy for Outer Space: Problems and Prospects of the Commercial Launch Industry, 29 JURIMETRICS J. 7, 13 (1988).
33. The first successful commercial launch was the launch of a Delta from Cape Canaveral on August 27, 1989. Kolcum, U.S. Reenters Commercial Launch Arena With Private Delta Mission, AVIATION WK. & SPACE TECH., Sept. 4, 1989, at 24.
34. OFFICE OF TECH. ASSESSMENT, INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION & COMPETITION IN CIVILIAN SPACE ACTIVITIES 104-06. (1985).
35. Corcoran & Beardsley, supra note 1, at 74-75.
36. The capacity of the Atlas to GTO is 2250 kg. Corcoran & Beardsley, supra note 1, at 75. The Atlas is an adequate competitor for single satellite launches, but is not large enough to handle double payloads. General Dynamics plans to produce Atlas rockets at the rate of eight per year through 1997, and has commitments to launch about half of them. Kolcum, supra note 31, at 23.
37. The payload capacity to GTO of the Delta II is 1800 kg, Corcoran & Beardsley, supra note 1, at 75, which might not be sufficient as demand in the 1990's shifts to larger satellites, see Dornheim, Near-Term Launch Market Looks Bright, but Questions Remain on Future Prospects, AVIATION WK. & SPACE TECH., Dec. 19, 1988, at 73. It has a fine record of success with 11 launches in 1990. Laurels 1990, AVIATION WK. & SPACE TECH., Jan. 7, 1991, at 11, 12.
38. The Commercial Titan has a payload capacity of 5625 kg to GTO, three times that of the Delta and more than twice that of the Atlas. Corcoran & Beardsley, supra note 1, at 75. Martin-Marietta has successfully launched two out of three Commercial Titans. Kolcum, Intelsat F6 Orbited by Commercial Titan Will Ease Communications Congestion, AVIATION WK. & SPACE TECH., July 2, 1990, at 25.
39. Kolcum, supra note 6, at 42, 43. The Titan's payload capacity to low Earth orbit (LEO) is 14,400 kg (17,700 kg for the Titan IV), Corcoran & Beardsley, supra note 1, at 75, which makes the Commercial Titan an attractive alternative to the space shuttle for lifting such large payloads as components of the space station, Kolcum, supra note 6, at 42-43.
40. The Air Force has given Martin-Marietta a firm commitment for 41 launches in the 1990's. Corcoran & Beardsley, supra note 1, at 75.
41. Single Atlas to Launch Three Small Satellites, AVIATION WK. & SPACE TECH., Mar. 26, 1990, at 24.
42. See infra notes 125-29 and accompanying text.
43. Reynolds & Merges, supra note 32, at 17.
44. R. Truly, SPACE SHUTTLE: THE JOURNEY CONTINUES 17 (1988).
45. See Asker, Failure to Support Space Ventures Threatens U.S. Aerospace Industry, AVIATION WK. & SPACE TECH., May 28, 1990, at 22.
46. E'Prime is hoping to use Peacekeeper missiles as the basis for its launch system. Corcoran & Beardsley, supra note 1, at 82-84.
47. Conatec is offering suborbital launches of sounding rockets to carry microgravity experiments. Hearings, supra note 27, at 16 (statement of Eugene Kadar, President of Conatec).
48. SSI was the first small company to demonstrate its launch capabilities with a suborbital flight of its Conestoga rocket in 1982. Corcoran & Beardsley, supra note 1, at 82. SSI has not yet had a successful test flight of a booster capable of putting a payload into LEO.
49. Amroc, previously known as Starstruck, has had great difficulty in developing its own rocket. Dornheim, Amroc Retains Key Personnel Despite Cutbacks After Pad Fire, AVIATION WK. & SPACE TECH., Oct. 30, 1989, at 20. However, Amroc is continuing to develop its new Aquila booster. Marketing efforts are under way and Amroc anticipates testing Aquila within the next few years, with commercial launches to follow shortly. Telephone interview with James Bennett, President of the American Rocket Company (Apr. 15, 1991).
50. The company's Pegasus rocket has been launched twice from an airborne B-52. Second Pegasus Launched Successfully; Small Satellites in Elliptical Orbit, AVIATION WK. & SPACE TECH., July 22, 1991, at 24. For Pegasus to be commercially viable, OSC/Hercules must obtain a commercial aircraft since the B-52 is available only for governmental launches. Stavro, Virginia Firm Uses a B-52 to Launch Satellites, L.A. Times, Apr. 6, 1990, at D1, D7. Orbital Sciences has managed to capture one commercial payload already; Sweden has chosen Pegasus for its December 1992 launch of its 230 kg Freja satellite. Sweden Reserves Space on Pegasus for Payload First Booked on Long March, AVIATION WK. & SPACE TECH., Jan. 1, 1990, at 38 [hereinafter Sweden Reserves Space].
51. The Scout has a payload capacity of 215 kg to LEO. Corcoran & Beardsley, supra note 1, at 74. It had been launched 112 times through the end of 1988, with a 95.5% success rate. Scott, Small-Payload Launch Companies Struggle to Define Their Market, AVIATION WK