†1998 Peter Lyman.
† Peter Lyman is a Professor in U.C. Berkeley's School of Information Management and Systems (SIMS) and a former University Librarian.
1. Many social scientists believe
that it is too soon to know if there is a discontinuity in subject or method,
and warn that focusing upon "social impacts of technology" encourages
theoretical modeling of the future, distracting from empirical research. See,
e.g., Paul Attewell, Research on Information Technology Impacts,
in FOSTERING RESEARCH
ON THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL
IMPACTS OF INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY 133, 134 (The National
Research Council, 1998); Claude S. Fischer, Computer Mediated Communications,
in FOSTERING RESEARCH
ON THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL
IMPACTS OF INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY 142, 143 (The National
Research Council, 1998).
2. Karen A. Cerulo, Reframing Sociological
Concepts for a Brave New (Virtual?) World, 67:1 SOCIOLOGICAL
INQUIRY 48, 55 (1997).
3. Id.
4. Id. at 49.
5. See SHERRY
TURKLE, THE
SECOND SELF
24 (1984); Sherry Turkle, Artificial Intelligence and Psychoanalysis: A New
Alliance, 117:1 DAEDALUS 241, 245 (1988);
SHERRY TURKLE,
LIFE ON THE
SCREEN: IDENTITY
IN THE AGE
OF THE INTERNET
177-209 (1995).
6. Bernard Lietaer, The Social
Impact of Electronic Money: A Challenge to the European Union? A REPORT
TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION'S
FORWARD STUDIES
UNIT (1998) (on file with author).
7. Michael Froomkin, Article 2B
as Legal Software for Electronic Contracting-Operating System or Trojan Horse?,
13 BERKELEY TECH.
L.J. * (1998).
8. See Michael Borrus &
Francois Bar, The Future of Networking, BRIE-Berkeley Roundtable on International
Economy, Research Paper, March 16, 1993 available to be ordered at <http://brie.berkeley.edu/BRIE/pubs/wp/index.html>)
(visited Nov. 8, 1998).
9. See United States Department
of Commerce, The Emerging Digital Economy (1998).
10. For a review of the growth and
dynamics of Internet information, see Peter Lyman and Brewster Kahle, Archiving
Digital Cultural Artifacts, D-lib (July-August 1998) (visited Nov. 7, 1998)
<http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july98/07lyman.html>. Because online information
is not archived, and Web sites often disappear, printed citations to Web page
sources often outlast the digital documents cited. However, the Internet Archive
has established a freely accessible permanent archive of all documents on the
public parts of the World Wide Web (that is, those that do not prohibit entry
by robot web crawlers). See Alexa Internet (visited Nov. 29, 1998) <http://www.Alexa.com>.
11. UCC 2B §§ 102(a)(24), (a)(26)
(Aug, 1, 1998 Draft).
12. Michele C. Kane, When is
a Computer Program not a Computer Program: The Perplexing World Created by Article
2B, 13 BERKELEY TECH.
L.J. * (1998).
13. Jane C. Ginsburg,
Authors as "Licensors" of "Informational Property Rights"
Under Article 2B, 13 BERKELEY TECH.
L.J. * (1998).
14. Jessica Litman, The Tales
that Article 2B Tells, 13 BERKELEY TECH.
L.J. *, *
(1998).
15. MANUEL CASTELLS,
THE RISE OF THE NETWORK
SOCIETY (1996).
16. DANIEL BELL,
THE COMING OF POST-INDUSTRIAL
SOCIETY (1973).
17.Castells, supra
note 15, at 61.
18. Historical economics literature
discusses the utility of fictions that treat land, labor and money as commodities.
See, e.g., KARL POLANYI,
THE GREAT TRANSFORMATION
68-76 (1944).
19. See FERNAND
BRAUDEL, THE
STRUCTURES OF EVERYDAY
LIFE 400-01 (1981). If the copyright
industry has turned to the information highway metaphor to analyze the network,
the academic community has turned to the digital library metaphor, using the
history of the book to gain perspective on the current situation. See, e.g.,
ELIZABETH EISENSTEIN,
THE PRINTING PRESS
AS AN AGENT OF CHANGE
453-520 (1979).
20. See Castells, supra
note 15, at 61. See also MANUEL CASTELLS,
THE POWER OF IDENTITY
at 5-67 (1997).
21. Julie Cohen, Copyright and
the Jurisprudence of Self-Help, 13 BERKELEY TECH.
L.J. *, *
(1998) (quoting Lawrence Lessig, The Zones of Cyberspace, 48 STANFORD
L. REV. 1403, 1433 (1996)).
22. Pam Samuelson, Encoding the
Law into Digital Libraries, 41 COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM
13, 13-14 (1998).
23. Geoff Cooper & Steve Woolgar,
Software is Society made Malleable: The Importance of Conceptions of Audience
in Software and Research Practice, Brunel University, Uxbridge Middlesex,
United Kingdom: The Program on Information and Communication Technologies, Policy
Research Paper No. 25, 1993, at 2 (on file with author).
24. Steve Woolgar, Configuring
the User: the Case of Usability Trials, in A SOCIOLOGY
OF MONSTERS: ESSAYS
ON POWER, TECHNOLOGY
AND DOMINATION 59 (1991). See
also Bruno Latour, Technology is Society Made Durable, in
A SOCIOLOGY OF MONSTERS:
ESSAYS ON POWER,
TECHNOLOGY AND DOMINATION
103-31 (1991).
25. Erik Brynjolfsson, The Productivity
Paradox of Information Technology: Review and Assessment, 36 COMMUNICATIONS
OF THE ACM 67, 67-77 (1993).
26. Don Cohen, Toward a Knowledge
Context, 40 CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT
REVIEW 22, 23 (1998).
27. JEAN LAVE
& ETIENNE WENGER,
SITUATED