![]() |
|
|
|
MAIN PAGE
CONFERENCE
DRAFT
RESOURCES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|
This is an unofficial draft of Article 2B from March 1998. For the current official version, see the University of Pennsylvania Law School (Official NCCUSL) site at http://www.law.upenn.edu/library/ulc/ulc.htm SECTION 2B-612 (1) Any use of the information or copies by the party refusing tender, or any disclosure of a trade secret or confidential information that violates (2) An aggrieved party (A) The aggrieved party (B) If the tendering party (3) An aggrieved party in possession of a refused copy (4) In complying with this section, an aggrieved party in possession of a refused copy licensee is held Uniform Law Source: Section 2-602(2), 2-603, 2-604. Reporter's Note: 1. Cancellation and Refusal. Subsection (a) reflects that a refusal of a delivery of a copy may or may not lead to a cancellation of the entire contract. When it does result in cancellation, the rules of Section 2B-702 apply to the entire contract and all related materials. If the contract is not cancelled, this section applies and the parties remain bound by all contractual obligations, except of course, as altered by the breach itself. 2. No Right to Use. Subsection (1) limits the refusing person's right to use the information in its possession. In general, a refusing party has no right to continue to use the refused copies. Uses inconsistent with the terms of this section or the contract constitute a breach by the party engaging in the misuse. The section does permit, however, limited uses for purposes of minimizing loss. That use does not extend to disclosure of confidential information or sale of the copies. It cannot be inconsistent with the refusal. This section asks courts to reach the balance discussed in Can-Key Industries v. Industrial Leasing Corp., 593 P.2d 1125 (Or. 1979) and Harrington v. Holiday Rambler Corp., 575 P.2d 578 (Mont. 1978) with respect to goods, but with an understanding of the nature of any intellectual property rights that may be involved here. 3. Handling Copies. Subsection (2) is adapted from current law in article 2. This section does not give the refusing party a right to sell goods, documentation or copies related to the intangibles under any circumstance. The materials may be confidential and may be subject to the overriding influence of the proprietary rights held and retained by the other party. As Comment 2 to current 2-603 states: "The buyer's duty to resell under [that] section arises from commercial necessity...." That necessity is not present in respect of information. The tendering party's interests are focused on protection of confidentiality or control, not on optimal disposition of the goods that may contain a copy of the information. 4. Confidentiality. Subsection (3) makes clear that, following refusal or revocation, both parties remain bound by confidentiality obligations with respect to the information. Unlike in reference to sales of goods, it is not uncommon that each party have some such information of the other and a mutual, continuing restriction is appropriate.
|