![]() |
|
|
|
MAIN PAGE
CONFERENCE
DRAFT
RESOURCES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|
This is an unofficial draft of Article 2B from March 1998. For the current official version, see the University of Pennsylvania Law School (Official NCCUSL) site at http://www.law.upenn.edu/library/ulc/ulc.htm SECTION 2B-608. (a) Except as otherwise provided in Sections 2B-603 and 2B-604, if performance requires delivery of a copy, the following rules apply: (1) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the party receiving the copy has a right to inspect at a reasonable place and time and in a reasonable manner in order to determine conformance to the contract before payment or acceptance. (2) Expenses of inspection must be borne by the party making the inspection. (3) A place or method of inspection or an acceptance standard fixed by the parties is presumed to be exclusive. However, the fixing of a place, method, or standard does not postpone identification to the contract or shift the place for delivery or for passing of title or the risk of loss. If compliance with the place or method becomes impossible, inspection must be made as provided in this section unless the place or method fixed by the parties was an indispensable condition whose failure avoids the contract. (4) A party's right to inspect is subject to obligations of (b) If a right to inspect exists under subsection (a) but the agreement is (c) If the contract requires payment before inspection of a copy, nonconformity in the tender of the copy does not excuse the party receiving the tender (1) the nonconformity appears without inspection and would justify refusal under Section 2B-609; or (2) in a documentary transaction and despite tender of the required documents, the circumstances would justify an injunction against honor of a letter of credit under Article 5. (d) Payment made under the circumstances described in subsection (b) or (c) does not constitute acceptance of Uniform Law Source: CISG art. 58(3); Section 2-512; 513. Substantially revised. Reporter's Note: 1. Subsection (a)(4) deals with the relationship between confidentiality and the right to inspect. Absent contrary agreement, inspection prior to payment is not appropriate if the type of inspection involved would reveal designated trade secrets or confidential information. This does not bar any inspection, but merely indicates that a right to see trade secret information cannot be presumed. Also, the balance here is limited to situations where the licensor designates information as confidential or a trade secret.
|