Evidence:

            Mirko Bagaric & Kumar Amarasekara, The Prejudice Against Similar Fact Evidence, 5 Int'l J. Evid. & Proof 71 (2001).  

            Vaughn C. Ball, The Myth of Conditional Relevance, 14 Ga. L. Rev. 435 (1980). 

            Dudley Barker, Lord Darling's Famous Cases (1936).

            Robert D. Brain & Daniel J. Broderick, The Derivative Use of Demonstrative Evidence:  Charting Its Proper Evidentiary Status, 25 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 957 (1992).

            Simon A Cole, Suspect Identities:  A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification (2001).

            Mirjan Damaška, Evidence Law Adrift (1997).  

            James J. Duane, The New Federal Rules of Evidence on Prior Acts of Accused Sex Offenders, 157 F.R.D. 95 (1994). 

            David L. Faigman, David H. Kaye, Michael J. Saks, and Joseph Sanders, How Good is Good Enough?  Expert Evidence Under Daubert and Kumho, 50 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 645 (2000).  

            G. Michael Fenner, The Residual Exception to the Hearsay Rule, 33 Creighton Law Review 265 (2000).  

            Richard D. Friedman, Character Impeachment Evidence:  The Asymmetrical Interaction Between Personality and Situation, 43 Duke L.J. 826 (1994).  

            Richard D. Friedman, The Conundrum of Children, Confrontation, and Hearsay, 65 Law & Contemp. Probs. 243 (2002).  

            Richard D. Friedman & Bridget McCormack, Dial-In Testimony, 150 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1171 (2002).  

            Richard D. Friedman, "E" is for Eclectic:  Multiple Perspectives on Evidence, 87 Va. L. Rev. 2029 (2001).  

            Victor Gold, Do the Federal Rules of Evidence Matter?, 25 Loyola L.A. L. Rev. 909 (1992).  

            Robert H. Hutchins & Donald Slesinger, Some Observations on the Law of Evidence, 28 Colum. L. Rev. 432 (1928).

            Edward J. Imwinkelried, The Use of Evidence of an Accused's Uncharged Misconduct to Prove Mens Rea, 51 Ohio St. L.J. 575 (1990).  

            Jonathan J. Koehler, DNA Matches and Statistics:  Important Questions, Surprising Answers, 76 Judicature 222 (1993).  

            Jonathan J. Koehler, On Conveying the Probative Value of DNA Evidence:  Frequencies, Likelihood Ratios, and Error Rates, 67 U. Colorado L. Rev. 859 (1996).  

            John H. Langbein, Historical Foundations of the Law of Evidence:  A View From the Ryder Sources, 96 Colum. L. Rev. 1168 (1996).  

            Joseph H. Levie, Hearsay and Conspiracy, 52 Mich. L. Rev. 1159 (1954).  

            Graham C. Lilly, An Introduction to the Law of Evidence (3d ed. 1996).  

            Brooks W. MacCracken, The Case of the Anonymous Corpse, American Heritage (1968)

            Kevin C. McMunigal & Calvin William Sharpe, Reforming Extrinsic Impeachment, 33 Conn. L. Rev. 363 (2001).  

            Thomas M. Mengler, The Theory of Discretion in the Federal Rules of Evidence, 74 Iowa L. Rev. 413 (1989).  

            Jennifer Mnookin, The Image of Truth:  Photographic Evidence and the Power of Analogy, 10 Yale J.L. & Human. 1 (1998).  

            Edmund M. Morgan, Admissions, 1 UCLA L. Rev. 18 (1953).  

            Edmund M. Morgan, Basic Problems of Evidence (1961).

            Andrew J. Morris, Federal Rule of Evidence 404(B):  The Fictitious Ban on Character Reasoning from Other Crime Evidence,17 Rev. Litig. 181 (1998)  

            Christopher B. Mueller & Laird C. Kirkpatrick, Evidence (1995).  

            Dale A. Nance, The Best Evidence Principle, 73 Iowa L. Rev. 227 (1998).  

            National Conference of Bar Examiners,  [Various Questions from the Multistate Bar Examination], (1992, 1995, 1996, and 2000).  

            Aviva Orenstein, No Bad Men:  A Feminist Analysis of Character Evidence in Rape Trials, 49 Hastings L.J. 663 (1998)  

            Roger C. Park, The Crime Bill of 1994 and the Law of Character Evidence:  Congress Was Right About Consent Defense Cases, 22 Fordham Urban L.J. 271 (1995).  

            Roger C. Park, David P. Leonard, & Steven H. Goldberg, Evidence Law (1998).  

            Roger C. Park, Evidence Scholarship, Old and New, 75 Minn. L. Rev. 849 (1991).  

            Merrill D. Peterson, Lincoln in American Memory (1994).

            Daniel C. Richman, Old Chief v. United States:  Stipulating Away Prosecutorial Accountability?, 83 Va. L. Rev. 939 (1997).  

            D. Michael Riseinger, Navigating Expert Reliability:  Are Criminal Standards of Certainty Being Left on the Dock?, 64 Albany L. Rev. 99 (2000).  

            Paul F. Rothstein, Intellectual Coherence in an Evidence Code, 28 Loyola L.A. L. Rev. 1295 (1995).

            Michael J. Saks, Banishing Ipse Dixit:  The Impact of Kumho Tire on Forensic Identification Science, 57 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 879 (2000).  

            Michael J. Saks & Jonathan J. Koehler, What DNA "Fingerprinting" Can Teach the Law About the Rest of Forensic Science, 13 Cardozo L. Rev. 361 (1991).  

            Stephen A. Saltzburg, Michael M. Martin, and Daniel J. Capra, Federal Rules of Evidence Manual (7th ed. 1998).  

            William H. Simon:  The Kaye Scholer Affair:  The Lawyer's Duty of Candor and the Bar's Temptations of Evasion and Apology, 23 Law & Soc. Inquiry 243 (1998).  

            Christopher Slobogin, Doubts About Daubert:  Psychiatric Anecdata as a Case Study, 57 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 919 (2000).  

            State Bar of California, California Bar Examination (1998).  

            John W. Strong, Consensual Modifications of the Rules of Evidence:  The Limits of Party Autonomy in an Adversary System, 80 Neb. L. Rev. 159 (2001).  

            John W. Strong ed., McCormick on Evidence (5th ed. 1999).

            Eleanor Swift, One Hundred Years of Evidence Law Reform:  Thayer's Triumph, 88 Cal. L. Rev. 2437 (2000).

            F. Tennyson Jesse, Trial of Madeleine Smith (1927)

            Laurence H. Tribe, Triangulating Hearsay, 84 Harv. L. Rev. 957 (1974).  

            Jon R. Walz, The Present-Sense Impression Exception to the Rule Against Hearsay:  Origins and Attributes, 66 Iowa L. Rev. 869 (1981).  

            Glen Weissenberger, The Former Testimony Exception:  A Study in Rulemaking, Judicial Revisionism, and the Separation of Powers, 67 N.C. L. Rev. 295 (1989).  

            Glen Weissenberger & James Duane, Federal Rules of Evidence (4th ed. 2001).

            John Shepard Wiley Jr., Taming Patent Cases (2002).  

            Charles Alan Wright & Kenneth C. Graham Jr., Federal Practice and Procedure:  Evidence (1980).  

Return to top of page

________________________