Deirdre K. Mulligan
Author(s): Deirdre K. Mulligan
recent White Paper on privacy from the U.S. Department of Commerce
encourages, "the development of voluntary, enforceable privacy codes of
conduct in specific industries through the collaborative efforts of
multi-stakeholder groups, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and a
envisages a coordination of multi-stakeholder groups through a new
voluntary but enforceable codes of conduct. Compliance with such a code
would serve as a safe harbor for companies facing certain complaints
about their privacy practices".
Privacy codes of practice have extensive histories in a number of countries outside the United States. At various times, they have been adopted to anticipate privacy legislation, to supplement privacy legislation, to preempt privacy legislation, and to implement privacy legislation. This paper draws upon international experiences and interviews with chief privacy officers to offer important lessons for American policymakers about how codes of practice might best encourage privacy protection on the ground.
Despite obvious differences, the Canadian policy experience may be especially instructive. Private sector regulation was originally based on a bottom-up approach through which legislation, called the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act of 2000, was based on a voluntarily negotiated standard through the Canadian Standards Association (CSA). This in turn was based on existing sectoral codes of practice, of the kind envisaged by the U.S. Department of Commerce. What has been the experience over the last decade? What useful lessons can be drawn for U.S. policy? What are the economic, technological, legal, and social conditions under which codes of practice might promote better privacy protection?
Keywords: privacy, codes of conduct, internet governanceLink: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2230369